vadimkravcenko

How to build your SaaS with freelancers?

22 June 2022 ·Updated 04 April 2026

Question

I was chatting with my friend about my plans to start a new SaaS. I told him that I was considering outsourcing the coding to contractors, but he wasn't too sure about it. He said it can go bad and will cost me a lot of money. "I don't know if that's such a good idea," he said. "It might take you longer than you expect to get your product off the ground, and you might not build exactly what you want" He had a point - but at the same time, I don't have any technical skills myself, so I really don't really have much of a choice. What do you think? Should I give freelancers a try?

Answer

I wasted the better part of a Sunday drafting a spec for a tiny SaaS idea—only to realise, after a quick sanity check with three potential customers, that nobody would pay for it. That was my cue (again) that throwing money at code before you’ve pressure-tested the business case is the fastest way to set it on fire. Still, sometimes the idea survives that gauntlet and you do need real engineering muscle. If you’re a non-technical founder, that usually means freelancers.

No-code platforms are still Plan A. Bubble, Glide, Make.com—pick your poison and see how far you can push it. You’d be surprised how many “complex” workflows boil down to a couple of Zapier zaps plus a Google Sheet. (I’ve shipped paid pilots that way and the users never noticed.) Exhaust those options first; once you’ve proven dollars are waiting on the other side, then reach for custom code.

If the feature list breaks the limits of no-code—or you simply can’t stand another drag-and-drop UI—two options remain: hunt for a technical co-founder or open the freelancer toolbox. The co-founder route buys you long-term continuity but usually takes months of courting and an equity slice. Freelancers start next week, cost cash, and tend to drift away when the contract ends. Pick your poison (I could be wrong, but I’ve never seen a perfect arrangement here).

Assemble the team

I’ve found that three roles cover 90 % of early-stage needs—though the exact mix depends on scope and budget:

  1. Frontend developer. Web app? Grab a React or Vue person. Mobile? Native still beats hybrid for polish, so you’ll want someone comfortable in Swift/Kotlin. Hourly rates range wildly—anywhere from “pizza money” to “mortgage-killer”—so get multiple quotes.
  2. Backend developer. Yes, some folks do full-stack, but splitting the layers keeps momentum high. Parallel tracks mean faster feedback loops. Same rate spread as above.
  3. Quality assurance. If you’re not prepared to click every button ten different ways at 1 a.m., hire someone who will. Junior QA contractors often bill a fraction of dev rates and save you from embarrassing first impressions.

Could you start with one versatile engineer instead of three? Sure. I’ve done that when cash was tight, but velocity suffered and context-switching created bugs. Trade-offs everywhere.

Where to find them? Upwork, Fiverr Pro, Toptal—the usual suspects. I always ask for two recent references plus a small paid test task (something that fits in half a day). Anyone unwilling to do that probably isn’t a fit.

Negotiate a fixed Price

Quotes for the same spec can come back anywhere from roughly €2k to €20k. Agencies pad in account managers, designers, and the comfort of a larger bench; solo freelancers cut overhead but carry more risk. Collect at least three bids so you have a baseline.

When scope is crystal-clear, I lean toward a fixed-price milestone structure—chunk the project into two-week deliverables with acceptance criteria and partial payouts. It caps downside and forces everyone to think through edge-cases early. If the spec is still a bit wobbly, time-and-materials might be safer, but only if you can commit to weekly budget reviews. (I once let a T&M engagement drift for six weeks—never again.)

The devil is in the details

Non-technical founders underestimate how much homework they owe the team. A decent brief usually contains:

  • Wireframes or mock-ups—Whimsical, Figma, Balsamiq, pick one
  • User stories in plain English: “When Karen uploads a CSV, she expects…”
  • Acceptance criteria: the checklist that decides if a feature is done
  • Basic data model—even a napkin ERD saves hours of guessing

Skip this prep and every stand-up devolves into “what did you mean by…?” (Side note: writing the spec often exposes fuzzy thinking—worth the effort even if you never hire anyone.)

Communication cadence matters as much as content. Daily Slack touch-points or twice-weekly video calls—whatever rhythm you choose, hold it. Ghosting your freelancers for a week is the fastest way to stall momentum.

General tips when building SaaS with Freelancers

A few hard-earned lessons:

  • Pay invoices on the date you promised. Momentum dies the moment people worry about cash.
  • Keep a living Kanban board (Trello, Linear, whatever) so everyone sees the same priorities.
  • Wireframes beat paragraphs. Screenshots with arrows beat wireframes.
  • Put a prototype in front of real users by week two—even if half the buttons are fake links. Early embarrassment is cheaper than late embarrassment.
  • Schedule weekly demos. Nothing motivates like having to show working software.

I should be upfront—this is just what’s worked for me across a handful of projects. Your mileage may vary, especially if you’re tackling domains with heavy compliance or hardware in the loop.

One last thought: my fastest-growing SaaS didn’t start with code at all. We manually processed every customer request through shared inboxes and Google Docs for the first month. That concierge MVP paid the first set of freelancers and gave us a spec grounded in reality, not guesswork. It helped — mostly, though we faced some challenges in scaling the process efficiently. Might be worth trying before you open the wallet.

Have fun building—and try not to pay for features nobody wants.

Worried your codebase might be full of AI slop?

I've been reviewing code for 15 years. Let me take a look at yours and tell you honestly what's built to last and what isn't.

Learn about the AI Audit →

No-Bullshit CTO Guide

268 pages of practical advice for CTOs and tech leads. Everything I know about building teams, scaling technology, and being a good technical founder — compiled into a printable PDF.

Get the guide →

2 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    Building a SaaS startup as a non-technical founder certainly presents its unique challenges, but leveraging freelancers can turn those challenges into opportunities. From my experience, the biggest game changer was learning how to communicate my vision effectively. It can’t be overstated how vital it is to provide clear, concise, and detailed instructions to your freelance team. This includes everything from your end goals to the specific functionalities you expect. Also, choosing the right project management tool made a world of difference for keeping tabs on progress and ensuring everyone is on the same page. Regular, possibly even daily, check-ins can help maintain momentum and address any issues before they become roadblocks. It’s all about mutual understanding, commitment, and staying involved throughout the process.

  2. Anonymous

    Hey there! I’ve been in your shoes before, trying to build a SaaS startup without a technical background. Trust me, it’s totally doable with the help of freelancers. Make sure to clearly communicate your vision, stay on top of deadlines, and don’t be afraid to ask questions. Working with freelancers can be a bit tricky, but the end result is definitely worth it. Just keep pushing forward and you’ll get there!

Cancel